|
Vote For Daniel Imperato 2008 Libertarian Party Presidential Candidate Absolutely Implicated  Top line HeadlinesMillion Independents March Washington Two Party & Multiparty Systems - Britannica Inter-subjective Non-duality Where Creative Context Emerges - Andrew Cohen THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX Interdependent Democracy - Rotary participatory design is under scope for the fifth party by revolving it in or out of wheeled pattern incorporating real presidential "debates and election" contests, for brief summery here, but allowing fifth (rotary-wheeled) party to participate in national presidential debates with the leading four, whether (as future) two, three or four are still of consideration as main parties. The party postured fifth is a constant off/on contender but having one foot in the pack of six or more minority parties and keeping other in front with the front four main. The discussion goes as "precisely how the outside and peripheral parties rotary or wheel up for connection to this preliminary process of these points here on my page. Email subscription to my newsletter commentary about this in more detail. Multiparty Parliamentary Democracy ... multiple veto players of coalition multiparty parliamentary democracies generate policy making dynamics akin to presidential systems.... Although Tsebelis thus identifies intriguing similarities between presidentialism and multiparty parliamentarism, the distinction remains important for our purposes. Under parliamentarism, multiple players can only be checking (i.e., veto), but hardly competing, agents. Thus, multiple agents under parliamentarism take on only one of the two possible roles that they can have under presidentialism.... Yet, multiparty parliamentary systems typically have more influential players (i.e., parties with significant bargaining power), even if these parties are not necessarily veto players. There are two important respects in which coalition parliamentarism may consequently differ from the two-party variety. These have to do with the effects of differences in reversion points and policy-making transparency, respectively. Note at the outset that, unlike United States federalism or presidentialism, parliamentarism was not the product of deliberate institutional design, but rather a historical accident of 19th century Britain. It has since spread to most of Western Europe. When we conceptualize parliamentary government, we are therefore trying to grasp the essence of an historical evolution rather than a deliberate human design.  Smart Tip On Page!FROM DAN Ran - Don't remember if I told you but I am considering Supreme Court cases, issues, and decisions to begin a web site. I did some research and found the Writ of Certiriori for the dissenting opinion in Bush v. Gore,et el, the 2000 Florida case. It was a 5 - 4 decision for Bush which stopped the Florida recount and gave Bush ( illegally ) the election. I have always believed that the US suffered a coup d'etat even though there was no bloodletting. The overthrow of governments has historically been accomplished by many ways. Politicians and the media were afraid to address it as such for fear of electorate revolt. Anyway, the four dissenting justices were made up of two Republican appointees and two Democrat appointees. Coincidentally, it was precisely the same four who dissented two weeks ago in the 5 - 4 decision banning late-term abortions. Multiparty.org "Toward Multiparty Democracy In The US" CHAPTER SIX CAMPAIGNS AND COALITION: BUILDING MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY Lew Rockwell Timeline October 9, 2005In vernaculars you would distinctly address this issue as a "third, fourth and fifth party system institutionalization" proposal. Because as we saw democracy in Canada wane by having four parties, where at the first two teamed together and subsequently the third and fourth teamed also, presenting the republic next with two parties there again. And of course here in USA with a third party two would ban together rendering the third, likely to be as is now we have an independent movement but not a real force in elections. We have one independent Senator. Klaus Rohrich of The Canada Free Press 8.23.04 writes - While the idea of having lots of choices among political parties may sound attractive, it ensures that a majority of Canadians never have their way. In addition, the presence of the Bloc Quebecois (our fourth "major" party) puts an interesting complexion onto the national scene, because this is the party whose prime existence is geared toward breaking Canada apart. Born To Run?Come On Line Up For The Rising. - Bruce we need you now for the rising - A Friend Building A Multiparty Democracy In America Public Campaign Action Fund September 17, 2003, Boston— “America cannot preach democracy to the world when the leader of our country sells access and influence to special interest contributors,” said David Donnelly, director of Campaign Money Watch Sign The Lincoln Call and receive updates Americans are fed up with the high cost of campaigning, and the high price we pay when special interest money dominates public policy debates. Join with other patriots by adding your name to call for an end of government of, by, and for the wealthy special interests. Fixing the Presidential Public Financing System The Presidential Candidate’s Pledge to Reduce the Role of Special Interest Money in Presidential Elections was drafted by six national reform organizations: Common Cause, Democracy 21, League of Women Voters, Public Campaign Action Fund, Public Citizen and USPIRG. These groups have formed the Presidential Public Financing Reform Project to promote major improvements to the presidential campaign finance system by reducing the role of special interest money in presidential elections, increasing the importance of public financing in the primaries, and making enactment of reforms a priority for the presidential candidates and for Congress. Books - Supreme Injustice Crashing The Party Presidential Campaign and Candidates C A S T In Order Of Appearance Natural Law Green Party Reform Party 
Multiparty Democracy Needed Now Diane Cardwell Writer For The NY Times Comment's On Professor Doug Muzzio of School Of Public Affairs at Baruch College (who says) - Chief policy-program goal seems to be the creation of a multiparty system or at least creating the conditions for the emergence of such a system and that "the system influenced not only the type of political parties that exist but also the type of candidates voters have to choose from" and went in the article on to say "ultimately, they determine the political stability and the legitimacy of the system itself.". Read her entire article and commentaries NY Times.Com Or email page publisher.Open The Debates INTRODUCTION - CHALLENGING THE TWO-PARTY SYSTEM IN THE CONTEXT OF AMERICAN POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT On average, 60 percent of Americans tell pollsters that they are in favor of third party alternatives. Republicans and Democrats have been able to maintain their dominance and no third party has representation in the U.S. Congress or is in contention for control of any state legislature. John Bibby and Sandy Maisel explained that the two-party system has come as a surprise to observers of American society: That the United States should have the oldest and strongest two-party system on the globe is for many, particularly for foreign observers, a bewildering phenomenon. America appears to have all the ingredients for a vibrant and enduring multiparty system--an increasingly multiracial and multi-ethnic population, substantial regional variation, diverse and conflicting economic and social interests, a history of sectional conflicts, and substantial disparities in the distribution of wealth. Open and Inclusive Debates Public debates afford voters an opportunity to learn about their candidates in ways that campaign literature, television ads, radio commercials, and the internet do not. The pseudo-governmental bipartisan Commission on Presidential Debates should be abolished in its current in favor of a non-partisan body that sets equitable criteria for the inclusion of candidates at the presidential level. Local non-partisan bodies should also serve to facilitate debates. Page campaigns individual political persuasion is plainly and precisely, "let whomever wins" the majority of votes declare them self winner though with this contingency however "that only after open media aired debates" as with presumption that presidential sanctioned debates, under well financed parties and their candidates have been predesignated as public announced, and do consist here of three 3 (three) or more participants. This would be the minimal appearing suggestion of our democratic national elections platform, in as such so our free enterprise and capitalist world determines real diplomacy at state level. Otherwise we are unrepresented in society as a cooperating nation built and running on absolute freedom. Less than 3 presidential candidates equally covered in media is nothing less than "majoritarian closed government rule" and an oligarchy, brewing next full blown "totalitarian rule" dominated by class distinction as we've seen the 2000 and 2004 elections fail to work all along a 2-party process. Since barring the third party candidates by separation of constitutional powers, (9.13.2000 - Nader/Buchannan) from public presidential debates for whatever no good reason, you (we) have "no fair options" in our vote booth. You have to (must) choose one or the other "main parties" and leadership labels that a choice. Be a smart voting citizen. Say NO to 1x2-party anarchical totalitarianism where control is absolute. - Randy Frushour USGP "The political discussion needs sort of a leg go set of descriptive and argumentative elements, so that situations, questions and proposals may be readily expressed" - John Tinker. Multiparty brief compilation sponsored by the United Debates Of America include intention to adopting resolution for nonpartisan "system institutionalization" reforms throughout the Twenty Zeros and Twenty Tens decades in resuming of 20 O's democracy in exile here - in the first decade - national legislating and proceedings of a dysfunctional Congress and elections actions of Republicans and Democrats if all non-innocent by association, negligent under our U.S. Constitution or emerging as an Amendment agenda of proceedings venue through the responsible Congress of the United States. Memo 03.12.2002 - revised 9.27.20 O6 USGP. Issues and Party Competition Under Alternative Electoral SystemsJeffrey A. Karp and Susan A. Banducci University of Waikato, New Zealand Proximity and directional spatial models yield different predictions for mass-elite linkages under alternative electoral systems. Whereas the proximity or Downsian model predicts that parties are likely to adopt positions that are closer to their voters, the alternative directional model predicts parties will adopt more extreme positions in order to generate political support among an electorate that has diffuse policy interests (Macdonald and Rabinowitz, 1989; Macdonald et al., 1991; Rabinowitz et al., 1991). Theoretical arguments lead us to expect that the directional model is most applicable in plurality systems, while the proximity model is best for describing party and voter behaviour in multiparty systems. While others have examined these models from a cross-national perspective, we employ an alternative research design using candidate and mass opinion data from New Zealand, where voters have experienced a change in the electoral system. EDITORIAL DRAFT DOCUMENT PREPARED Randy Frushour U.S. PUBLISHER  International Consortium ColloquiumMy planning document is prepared for organizers in a multiparty democracy system as reinstated polygonal and presently a working campaign in the United States that is fast moving toward geo-political economic cooperation for any ones use in sharing and formatting their own word documents, as "proposed legislation" on same topics declaring "public rights and freedoms." I'm NOT entering politics nor am I running for office nor, lawyer or an elite though do have great or some "publication credibility or recognition" as managing and editing Producers of more than "ephemeral print document appearance." I began net publishing with, and will finish if possible "voicing platforms for regular or common people - so a Voice For Future Generations." The need for a multiparty polygonal electorate college is not incompatible nor inconsistent with the need for greater awareness of global rising of "secret government," legal anarchy and some terrorism. It is my concern in and for this word proposal to see a "central document" emerge as co-initiators of "campaign reform" move ahead for an Equal Campaign Rights Amendment and with some consideration of the highlights of this page and with discussions of the independent movement. Now in 1993 voters in New Zealand approved a referendum changing its electoral system from a plurality or "first past the post" (FPP) to proportional representation (PR). The adoption or PR represents a radical change from majoritarian to a consensus democracy. There are no current empirical studies on how "change in the electoral system" has altered the relationship between elites and voters... UNLESS Comparative Politics Studies Of - The Size Of Government In Majoritarian And Consensus Democracies Party Institutionalization In New Democracies Vicky Randall University of Essex and Lars Svåsand University of Bergen The literature on democratization emphasizes the contribution of political parties, and in that context the importance of party institutionalization. But this concept remains relatively unexplored. Our article first considers the relationship between party institutionalization and party system institutionalization, pointing out that they are not necessarily convergent. We then review the existing literature on party institutionalization, indicating weaknesses and contradictions, before offering our own analytic model. In the final section we identify some of the key considerations arising when this model is applied to the particular circumstances of democratic transition in the Third World. Resolution - Target five institutionalized parties of presidential candidacies and achieve four or three contenders anyway in a popular state-for-state vote tally outcome, with the otherwise "not yet to date third party," there next achieving a second or first place outcome with recommendation through continued use of the "electoral college" which is based on prior popular state vote tallies. This Post and the "Twenty Zeros" records will be updated regularly and posted here for your viewing pleasure. Please note that when 3 contending candidacy rise before the electoral count, there would require "only but" 181 electoral votes "to clinch" in the near tie and if when with 4 contenders in a close race splitting up the votes "136 would win out over the other 3 receiving 135 electoral votes." The Elections 2000 Dilemma though distances itself and does diminish when 3 or more contenders battle out in the electoral college. It should and must follow then that when more than 2 candidates are nearing a tie the one with the most electoral votes simply wins a decision as does in a close 2-candidate race. Randy Frushour Speeches Protest Demonstration Platforms How Transnational Factors Influence the Success OF Ethnic, Religious and Regional Parties in 21 States Livianna S. Tossutti University of Calgary This article explores whether ethnic, religious and regional parties in 21 advanced capitalist democracies are more likely to achieve political salience in systems which have been more exposed to the effects of globalization and post-industrialization. Globalist-localist scholars have argued that the new localism - which encompasses the post-war resurgence of decentralist political movements - is linked to intensified international interdependence and changes in production and consumption modes. Using quasi-likelihood statistical methods, we find that parties catering to particularist interests are more likely to participate in ruling coalitions to support minority governments, or to serve as the official opposition in countries that have been relatively insulated from transnational forces. While domestic economic conditions and a party's lifespan and programmatic orientation also influence the probability for success, domestic institutional arrangements such as electoral systems and the division of powers do not. Book Too Close To Call |
 Sign Guestbook |
 View Guestbook |
    |
|
. |